Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), getting a score of 81.2 against 74.8. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored) has Android 15 version. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better performance than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller display. The LG V40 ThinQ takes slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution and a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a much worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures in low-light environments.
LG V40 ThinQ features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored) has better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.