Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2019-09-05 |
| -- | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored)'s score of 74.8. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored) counts with a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored) counts with a little better battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Motorola One Zoom counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a lot smaller sensor taking much worse quality images and videos, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.