Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| -- | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is better than the Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored)'s 74.8 score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version and Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored) has Android 15. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a lot more opaque display and a little smaller screen. The Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored) features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos and a tinier back camera sensor taking worse quality images and videos, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.