Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), getting a global score of 81.1 against 74.8. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version while Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a lot better screen than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low light situations and a tinier sensor, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored) has more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.