Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), with a 79 score against 74.8. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the older 11 version and Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored) has Android 15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a very superior performance than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better looking display than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a little smaller display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a better camera than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a lesser MP back facing camera and a much tinier back camera sensor which gives a way worse image and video quality, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored) features a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold 7 (Rumored), because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.