Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is a little bit better than the iPhone 13's general score of 91.5. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Fold is older and incredibly heavier than the iPhone 13, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. The Galaxy Fold has Android 9.0 Pie operating system, while iPhone 13 counts with iOS 15.x operating system.
IPhone 13 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 13 has a better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number per display inch.
The Galaxy Fold takes just a bit better videos and photos than iPhone 13, and although they both have the same video resolution, a 12 mega pixels camera and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 13, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Fold has a superior battery life than Apple iPhone 13, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 3227mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the iPhone 13, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as iPhone 13. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the iPhone 13, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.