Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a little bit better than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, having a global score of 97.6 against 93.3. The Galaxy Fold comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS, and Apple iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x OS. Even though Galaxy Fold is older and a lot heavier than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, it's construction is still just a little thinner.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a superior hardware performance than Galaxy Fold, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. IPhone 13 Pro features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1170 x 2532 resolution, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Fold has a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro. They have the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture, a 12 mega pixels resolution back camera and the same video resolution. Galaxy Fold features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the iPhone 13 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the iPhone 13 Pro. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, else you can save some dollars and buy the iPhone 13 Pro, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.