Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is slightly better than the iPhone 13 Pro Max's 93.2 global score. The Galaxy Fold design is just a little bit thinner than the iPhone 13 Pro Max, although it is heavier and was released many years before. The Galaxy Fold comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, and iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number per inch of display and a little higher 1284 x 2778 resolution. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max. They have a 12 MP camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a F1.5 aperture and the same video frame rate. Galaxy Fold features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a battery performance that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy Fold's battery lifetime, although the iPhone 13 Pro Max has a 1% lower battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the iPhone 13 Pro Max, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as iPhone 13 Pro Max. If you want to save some money, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro Max, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.