Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 16.x |
| 2019-09-27 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a bit better than iPhone 14 Pro Max, having a 97.6 score against 94.9. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is somewhat thinner than the iPhone 14 Pro Max, but it's heavier and was released 3 years before. Samsung Galaxy Fold comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, and iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with iOS 16.x operating system.
IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a better processor than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1290 x 2796 pixels and a better screen pixels density.
IPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy Fold counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage. IPhone 14 Pro Max and Galaxy Fold count with extremely similar battery durations, although the iPhone 14 Pro Max has just 4323mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the iPhone 14 Pro Max, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as iPhone 14 Pro Max. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy iPhone 14 Pro Max, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.