Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 9.x |
| 2019-09-27 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is better than iPhone 6s, getting a 97.6 score against 83. Galaxy Fold counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, while iPhone 6s works with iOS 9.x operating system. Even though the Galaxy Fold is much heavier than iPhone 6s, it's just a little bit thinner and notably newer. IPhone 6s features just a little better processing power than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a graphics co-processor.
The Apple iPhone 6s counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, although it has a lot lower 1334 x 750px resolution, a much smaller display and a just a bit worse pixels density. Galaxy Fold counts with a slightly better camera than iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light situations and better video frame rates.
Galaxy Fold counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 6s, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone 6s, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the iPhone 6s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as iPhone 6s. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, else you can save some dollars and get the iPhone 6s, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.