Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the Apple iPhone X, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 88.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold is extremely heavier than Apple iPhone X, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. The iPhone X counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little worse 1125 x 2436px resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density.
The iPhone X features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Fold, because although it has 9 GB less RAM and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a 12 mega-pixels camera in the back and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone X, because it has more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than the iPhone X, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.