Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is better than iPhone XR's score of 82. The Galaxy Fold design is newer and thinner than iPhone XR's, but it is incredibly heavier. The iPhone XR has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and 9 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone XR features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, although it has a much lower 828 x 1792px resolution, a just a little lower pixels density and a bit smaller display. The Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better camera than iPhone XR, and although they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the same 60 fps video frame rates, a same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger camera aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than the iPhone XR, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.