Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the iPhone XS, getting a score of 97.6 against 84.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is notably heavier than the iPhone XS, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. IPhone XS features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lesser and slower cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little worse 1125 x 2436 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen. Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Fold shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same sensor size, the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way better battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 65% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the iPhone XS, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.