Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blue and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than the Google Nexus 6's general score of 81.1. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is notably heavier than the Google Nexus 6, it's noticeably thinner and much newer. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1, so it offers a couple additional features.
Google Nexus 6 features a sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater display density. Galaxy Fold has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and more processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots clearer pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better storage for applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more money than Google Nexus 6, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.