Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than Google Pixel, with a 97.6 score against 80.2. Even though the Galaxy Fold is much heavier than the Google Pixel, it's noticeably thinner and much newer. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Google Pixel has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller display and a much lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Fold captures a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a less mega-pixels back camera, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a tinier camera sensor, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 58 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.