Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. Galaxy Fold's design is newer and thinner, but extremely heavier than the Google Pixel 3. Google Pixel 3 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better display density.
Galaxy Fold has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Fold takes slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a worse video definition and a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, and they both have a 0.39 inches camera sensor, the Galaxy Fold also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments.
The Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 448 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.