Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than the Google Pixel 4, with a 97.6 score against 81.9. Although Galaxy Fold and Google Pixel 4 were released only 1 months apart, Galaxy Fold's design is thinner but much heavier. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
Galaxy Fold has a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a worse video resolution and a lesser MP back-facing camera, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations.
The Galaxy Fold has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 448 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 4, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.