Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 4 XL's general score of 82.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold and Google Pixel 4 XL were only released 1 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Fold body is heavier but somewhat thinner than Google Pixel 4 XL. The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. The Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, and they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy Fold also counts with a larger aperture. The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4 XL. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.