Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4a's global score of 82.9. Galaxy Fold's design is somewhat thinner than Google Pixel 4a, but it is heavier and was released around 11 months before. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version, so it gives you some extra features and performance improvements.
The Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Fold features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a less megapixels back facing camera, and they both have a same size sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also counts with a larger aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4a, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.