Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than HTC U Ultra, having a score of 97.6 against 77. Although the Galaxy Fold is noticeably heavier than HTC U Ultra, it's thinner and also much newer. The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
HTC U Ultra features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display density. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much bigger storage for applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Fold features a slightly better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy Fold also counts with better video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the HTC U Ultra, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.