Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 362 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than HTC U11's global score of 77.6. Galaxy Fold's construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC U11's, but it is a lot heavier. HTC U11 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 46 percent larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better camera than HTC U11, and although they both have the same video quality, a 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and the same sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger aperture for better low light photography and video and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U11. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the HTC U11, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.