Compare phones
LG G3
AT&TD850
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.2 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2014-05-27 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.26 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the LG G3, having a score of 97.6 against 76.4. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and LG G3 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you some extra features. Galaxy Fold's design is newer and a lot thinner than LG G3's, although it is much heavier.
Galaxy Fold counts with a little better performance than LG G3, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. LG G3 has a way better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a greater display pixels density.
The Galaxy Fold has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Fold has a little bit better camera than LG G3, because although it has a worse video quality and a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera sensor and a way bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG G3, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G3. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G3, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.