Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than LG G7 Fit's 77 general score. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than the LG G7 Fit.
LG G7 Fit features an incredibly better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. Galaxy Fold counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Fold features a bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot bigger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy Fold has a much better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.