Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Holographic white |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than LG Stylo 6, with a 97.6 score against 76.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and LG Stylo 6 were released only 8 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is way thinner but also extremely heavier than LG Stylo 6. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, giving you a couple nice extra features.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2460px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel number per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has much more storage capacity for apps and games than LG Stylo 6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit better hardware performance than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Galaxy Fold features a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos, a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and a way better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG Stylo 6, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.