Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than LG V10, having a general score of 97.6 against 78.6. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, providing you some nice extra features and optimized performance. The Galaxy Fold construction is extremely newer and noticeably thinner than the LG V10's, but it is way heavier.
Galaxy Fold has a superior processing power than LG V10, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. LG V10 features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater pixel number per display inch.
LG V10 captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with higher 120 fps video frame rates and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Fold has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than LG V10, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy Fold has a superior battery life than LG V10, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V10. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V10, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.