Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting a 97.6 score against 82.5. Even though Galaxy Fold is notably heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ, it's a little bit thinner and newer. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo, counting with a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Fold takes slightly better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lower video definition and a way lower resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has greater battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.