Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a general score of 97.6 against 81.3. The Galaxy Fold construction is newer and a bit thinner than LG V35 ThinQ's, although it's heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a better pixel density.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a little better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Fold counts with greater battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Fold features a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.