Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is better than the LG V60 ThinQ's global score of 87.6. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11, giving some extra features and performance optimizations. Even though the Galaxy Fold and the LG V60 ThinQ were released with only 6 months difference, Galaxy Fold's construction is notably heavier but also way thinner.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Fold features a bit better hardware performance than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4380mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much better video definition.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V60 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V60 ThinQ, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.