Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a bit better than the LG Wing, having a 97.6 score against 91.2. The Galaxy Fold is an older and a bit heavier phone than the LG Wing, but Samsung managed to build it a lot thinner anyway. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and LG Wing has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior CPU than LG Wing, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. LG Wing has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a bit better count of pixels per inch of screen.
The LG Wing takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the LG Wing also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG Wing has a greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Fold, because although it has just 256 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better battery performance than LG Wing, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG Wing, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Wing. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, else you can save some money and get the LG Wing, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.