Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and Forged Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than the Motorola Defy (2021), having a general score of 97.6 against 77.2. Galaxy Fold's construction is thinner than the Motorola Defy (2021), but it's somewhat heavier and was released about 21 months before. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version, providing the user some additional features and optimized performance.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a sharper display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a greater screen density, a lot better resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a quite bigger display. Galaxy Fold counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Fold features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM. Motorola Defy (2021) counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola Defy (2021) takes slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Defy (2021) also counts with a lot better resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.