Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting a score of 97.6 against 78.5. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12, offering a couple additional features and increased performance. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is an a lot older and way heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Samsung made it a little thinner anyway.
Galaxy Fold features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better count of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's battery duration is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Fold one, although the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a very superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.