Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's general score of 80.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12. Although the Galaxy Fold is incredibly older and much heavier than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's design is still somewhat thinner.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy Fold has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because it has more RAM and more cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality pictures, a lot better 200 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much better video quality.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.