Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is way better than the Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 overall score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold is notably older and way heavier than Motorola Edge 40, it's construction is still just a little thinner. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
Motorola Edge 40 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little higher pixels density. Galaxy Fold counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 40 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera, a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold and Motorola Edge 40 both feature really similar battery durations, although the Motorola Edge 40 also has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.