Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 general score. Galaxy Fold's construction is somewhat thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it is notably heavier and was released many years before. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13, giving a lot of extra features.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Fold features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.