Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with a score of 97.6 against 83.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is much thinner than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it is incredibly heavier and was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little greater display density.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a way better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.