Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's global score of 81.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a way older and much heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung was able to build it thinner anyway.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a higher pixels quantity per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Fold features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in poorly lited environments and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy Fold has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 2 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.