Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | -- |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 9.74 ounces | -- |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s score of 78.9. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14, giving you lots of additional features.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a little lower pixels amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels. Galaxy Fold counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024). They have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher 50 MP resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.