Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's general score of 86.3. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Fold is extremely older and heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's construction is still thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
Galaxy Fold has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the Samsung Galaxy Fold, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.