Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, with a 97.6 score against 87.1. The Galaxy Fold construction is notably thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but it is much heavier and was released 5 years before. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14, providing some additional features.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an incredibly better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel quantity per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both have 12 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's memory to install games and applications is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Fold's one, both have equal 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a much larger sensor capturing way higher quality photos and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.