Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is better than the Motorola Moto G 5G's 81.5 general score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, providing you some extra features and better performance. The Galaxy Fold is an older and incredibly heavier device than Motorola Moto G 5G, but Samsung could make it incredibly thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Fold and the Moto G 5G feature very similar displays, because although the Moto G 5G has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little faster CPU than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.