Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, getting a 97.6 score against 82.6. The Galaxy Fold is an older and incredibly heavier device than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, but Samsung made it extremely thinner anyway. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
Galaxy Fold features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in low light situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Fold features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.