Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), with a 97.6 score against 76.5. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is notably thinner than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), although it is extremely heavier and was released just a bit further than a year before. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a more vivid display than Moto G Power (2021), because it has a way higher resolution of 1536 x 2152px, a quite bigger display and a better display density.
The Galaxy Fold has a little faster CPU than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. The Moto G Power (2021) has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Moto G Power (2021) also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy Fold has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G Power (2021) counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4380mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power (2021). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power (2021), giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.