Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), with a 97.6 score against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), although it's noticeably heavier and was released around 16 months before. Moto G Stylus (2021) has a display that is just as good as Galaxy Fold's screen, because although the Moto G Stylus (2021) has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Moto G Stylus (2021) has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.