Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting a 97.6 score against 76. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy Fold is much older and much heavier than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's design is still much thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a way better performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little worse pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1536 x 2152 and a bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior storage for applications and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and video in low light environments, a way tinier sensor providing a lot lower image quality and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.