Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G's 86.2 score. The Galaxy Fold construction is notably thinner than Motorola Moto G200 5G, but it's much heavier and was released many years before. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version.
The Moto G200 5G features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a little better screen density. Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Motorola Moto G200 5G feature extremely similar processors, and although the Motorola Moto G200 5G has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a way tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
Moto G200 5G features a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.