Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-12-06 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Baby Blue and Mineral Grey |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G31's general score of 77. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto G31 has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is extremely thinner than Motorola Moto G31, although it is a lot heavier and was released 2 years before.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The Moto G31 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G31, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The Moto G31 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G31 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Moto G31 features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.