Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2022-01-28 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than Moto G41, with a 97.6 score against 79.1. The Galaxy Fold construction is thinner than Moto G41, but it is extremely heavier and was released 2 years before. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Moto G41 has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Moto G41 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto G41 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G41 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G41, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G41 has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.