Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, getting a general score of 97.6 against 77.8. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G51 5G has Android 11. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is incredibly older and notably heavier than Motorola Moto G51 5G, it's design is still incredibly thinner.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto G51 5G counts with a screen that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy Fold, because although the Moto G51 5G has a little worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G51 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G51 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G51 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and faster 240 fps video frame rate.
The Moto G51 5G has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.