Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than the Moto G60's global score of 79.5. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G60 has Android 11 version, offering a couple additional features. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and heavier than Moto G60, it's construction is still much thinner.
Moto G60 counts with a screen that's very similar to the screen in Galaxy Fold, because although the Moto G60 has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little bit better performance than Moto G60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Moto G60 takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60 also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G60, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G60 has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 37% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.