Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | -- |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than Motorola Moto G60s, with a global score of 97.6 against 79.9. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11. The Galaxy Fold design is a lot thinner but extremely heavier than Motorola Moto G60s.
Moto G60s features a display that is very similar to the Galaxy Fold one, because although the Moto G60s has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater screen density. Galaxy Fold has a little faster processing unit than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G60s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Moto G60s counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G60s shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking images or video in poorly lited environments and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60s also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.